How important is Friar Lawrence, in his language and his actions to the development of Romeo and Juliet Essay Example For Students

How important is Friar Lawrence, in his language and his actions to the development of Romeo and Juliet? Essay Friar Lawrence plays a key role in Romeo and Juliet, as an advisor to the couple, as the cleric who marries them to each other, and by planning the means of their escape from Verona. Throughout the play, his intentions may be played as being good (although this is debatable), however, the ironic outcome of his various failed stratagems is to bring about the lovers deaths, which he should have foreseen and ought to have avoided. His actions are heavily ironic, as he says in his first speech, Virtue itself turns vice being misapplied (1.3.21), meaning that even well-intentioned clerics can cause immense evil and suffering through their actions. Similarly, he advises Romeo Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast (2.3.94) which is in obvious contradiction to his agreement to marry a couple who have only been together less than hour! Although Lawrence is able to prevent Romeo from killing himself after his banishment (3.3.109-199) it is arguably his irresponsible encouragement of the romance, and his conduct of an unlawful clandestine marriage which brings Romeo, and then Juliet to the depths of despair. Lawrence could be played an unworldly and somewhat naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve man, perhaps well-intentioned, but also vainly ambitious (to end the feud), and with little real sense of the depths of hatred between the feuding families. Zeferellis film makes clear the scale of the public violence surrounding the families vendetta, and the degree to which innocent bystanders are drawn in. However, Buz Luhrmans (1996) version cast Pete Postlethwaite as a hippy Friar Lawrence, whose retreat from reality and knowledge of plants and potions is due to a drug habit. This resurrects a note familiar to Shakespeares first audience, that Franciscan friars were immoral people, whose outward spirituality was often just a cover for a life of vice. Such immoral clerics were familiar from medieval mystery plays, anti-catholic propaganda, and Marlowes Doctor Faustus, which cast the demon Mephistopheles as a friar. Lawrence, in his hillside cell, could be seen as remote from the reality of his community, and therefore a poor choice of an advisor for the couple, who more than anything need informed, practical advice. People often shop around for the advice they can agree with, and Lawrence is the only person in Verona who would encourage this marriage, since he believes it offers an opportunity To turn households rancour to pure love. (2.3.92) A celibate churchman would not be many teenagers first choice of an advisor, and the couple only choose him because they cannot trust anyone else. The couple cannot trust their parents or extended families, and Romeo shuts out Mercutio and Benvolio from his thoughts. Juliet hasonly the Nurse to confide in, who is an even less reliable advisor. When he first appears collecting plants on a hillside above Verona, he may seem a rather distracted and professorial figure. He believes nought so vile that on earth doth live, / But to the earth some special good doth give which seems naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve after what we have seen of the behaviour of the Capulet and Montague servants (1.1) and especially Tybalt, who needs no encouragement to violence, and spurns good sense and moderation (1.1. 68-9 1.5.52-7, 1.5.88-91) His actions are illegal, according to (1) the English law of marriage, (2) Catholic canon law, as the marriage he concludes is clandestine, done without the consent of the couples parents. Moreover, Romeo and Juliet are minors (at least in England), and here the plays exotic Italian setting allows Shakespeare to suspend the audiences disbelief. If Lawrence does not know what he has done, he is foolish naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve, whereas if he does, he is dishonest. Evidence for the second point of view is the way he arranges Juliets faked death (4.1.89-120) as the means of helping her avoid the hastily planned marriage to Paris. Unlike Romeo, Juliet does not fully trust Lawrence, fearing he might poison her Lest in this marriage he should be dishonoured /Because he married me before to Romeo? / I fear it is. (4.3.24-28). When she says he hath still been tried a holy man (4.3.29) her belief seems a rationalisation, grudging at best: at this point, she has no alternative but to trust the friar. Live like pigs and refugees drama comparison EssayLawrences most eloquent and effective speech is his final brief (40 line) summing up of the plays action (5.3 229-269). This is dramatically necessary to inform both the Monatague and Capulet families, as well as the Prince, of the full truth of the preceding events. Often cut from productions on the grounds of redundancy, this speech can be dramatically effective, moving audiences, as it clearly moves those on stage, so that ironically Lawrence is final able to shock and shame the couples feuding families into a final reconciliation. As in (4.5), Lawrence does not seek to soften the blow for the grieving parents. On top of the horror of seeing the gore of the tomb, which they can see for themselves, Lawrence draws their attention to both their dead bodies and previously hidden past history (Romeo, there dead And she, there dead, 5.3.231-2); he persistently asks the audience to confront the tragedy of their deaths, as well as those of Paris and Tybalt (5.3.234-64), thus emphasising the scale of the tragedy almost a whole generation wiped out for nothing. He then reveals the truth of the lovers relationship, adding a note of pathos by commemorating the couples devotion and fidelity, underscoring their hidden identities as bride and groom, husband and wife (husband to that Juliet, Romeos faithful wife, 5.3.231-2). Lawrences recapitulation of events demands that the audience relive and reconsider the totality of the plays action. It is also an opportunity for Lawrence to spread the blame for those events on to others, before only at the end accepting any blame himself. His short date of breath (5.3.229) is arguably an appeal for sympathy before beginning his account. At first, he merely notes that I married them and quickly glosses over the self- compromising details of their stolen marriage-day (5.3.233). Everyone is held accountable: You Betrothd and would have married perforce, /To County Paris (5.3.237-29). Juliets wild looks and suicide threat (4.1.49-69 )forced Lawrence into action. He then goes into the bare facts of his plan: the feigned death, reviving Juliet in his cell, and bringing Romeo back from Mantua, drawing first Friar John (5.3.250-252) and then the Nurse (5.3.266) into his tangled web. He glosses over his final hasty plan, so his final acceptance of responsibility and plea for punishment arguably sounds less sincere (5.3.266-269). He omits to say why he is too scared to stay with the desperate Juliet and prevent at least her suicide. While Romeos final letter to his father confirms most of Lawrences account, (5.3.286-290), Lawrence has arguably spun the story of the lovers courtship, marriage and death in his own favour. The last word on Lawrence in the play goes to the Prince, who still says We still have known thee for a holy man . This line, which eerily echoes Juliet (4.3.29, above) could be made to bristle with tension, and the family members could be directed to blanch at any attempt to clear the Friar. And even if the Princes words are meant to be taken at face value, one wonders if he and the grieving families will be so forgiving later. In conclusion, Friar Lawrence is a morally ambiguous character in the play, whose actions play a great part in the lovers tragedy, and whose motivation is anything but clear and straightforward.